PhysiqueAI logo featuring a stylized letter P in vibrant green with a starburst element, representing AI-powered fitness coaching
Body Fat Calculator

Body Fat Calculator - Free Estimate

Use the U.S. Navy method below for a quick body fat percentage estimate, or get instant AI-powered analysis from a photo—no tape measure needed.

Get AI Photo Analysis Freeor use the Navy method calculator below
Privacy-firstNo credit card10-second results

The Problem with Manual Calculations

Research shows that manual body fat calculation methods have significant accuracy limitations. A study published in PMC comparing different methods found that the Navy formula has an accuracy of ±3-4% compared to DEXA scans—meaning if you calculate 20%, your actual body fat could be anywhere from 16-24%.

Navy Method

±3-4%
Pros
  • Free
  • No equipment
  • Quick
Cons
  • Measurement error
  • Doesn't account for muscle
  • Formula limitations

Calipers

±3-5%
Pros
  • Inexpensive
  • Portable
Cons
  • Requires skill
  • Only measures subcutaneous fat
  • Inconsistent between testers

BIA Scales

±5-8%
Pros
  • Easy to use
  • Track trends
Cons
  • Hydration affects results
  • Varies by time of day
  • Often wildly inaccurate

DEXA Scan

±1-2%
Pros
  • Gold standard
  • Full body analysis
Cons
  • $75-150 per scan
  • Requires appointment
  • Not practical for regular tracking

Navy Method Calculator

Your Measurements

Measure at navel level

Below Adam's apple

Skip the Tape Measure

Get body fat % in 10 seconds

PhysiqueAI uses AI trained on DEXA-validated data to estimate your body fat from a single photo. No measurements, no math, no margin for measurement error.

  • No tape measure or calipers needed
  • More consistent than manual measurements
  • Track progress over time with photo history
  • 15+ body composition metrics
  • Works with mirror selfies
Get AI Analysis Free

No credit card required

Privacy-firstNo credit card10-second results

What the Research Says

Method Accuracy Comparison

A 2022 study in PMC comparing DEXA, BIA, and skinfold methods in athletes found significant differences between methods:

  • BIA underestimated body fat by ~10% compared to DEXA in males
  • Skinfold methods showed 6-7% lower readings than DEXA
  • Results varied significantly between testers

Navy Method Limitations

Research from the U.S. Navy Body Composition Assessment study found that the tape method:

  • Has ±3-4% accuracy when performed correctly
  • Doesn't account for muscle mass differences
  • Can misclassify muscular individuals as higher body fat

Body Fat Percentage Ranges

Men

Essential Fat2-5%

Competition bodybuilders, not sustainable

Athletic6-13%

Visible abs, vascular

Fitness14-17%

Lean, some ab definition

Average18-24%

Healthy range for most men

Above Average25%+

Room for improvement

Women

Essential Fat10-13%

Competition level, not sustainable

Athletic14-20%

Very lean, athletic build

Fitness21-24%

Fit appearance, toned

Average25-31%

Healthy range for most women

Above Average32%+

Room for improvement

Get accurate results in 10 seconds

Skip the tape measure and guesswork. PhysiqueAI analyzes your photo with AI trained on DEXA-validated data. Just take a mirror selfie.

10 second resultsJust upload a photo±2-3% accuracy
Try Photo Analysis Free

No credit card required • 1 free scan/month

Privacy-firstNo credit card10-second results

Related Calculators